000			03076cam a22003858i 4500
999			_c19781 _d19781
001			21616827
003			OSt
005			20250422172057.0
008			200720s2020 enk b 001 0 eng
010			_a 2020031616
020			_a9781316636343 _q(hardback)
040			_aDLC _beng _erda _cDLC
042			_apcc
082	0	0	_a401.452 BOU _223
100	1		_aBoucher, Victor J., _d1959- _eauthor.
245	1	4	_aThe study of speech processes : _baddressing the writing bias in language science / _cVictor J. Boucher, Université de Montréal.
263			_a2102
264		1	_aCambridge, United Kingdom ; _aNew York, NY : _bCambridge University Press, _c2023.
300			_a310p.
336			_atext _btxt _2rdacontent
337			_aunmediated _bn _2rdamedia
338			_avolume _bnc _2rdacarrier
504			_aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
505			_aPart I. Questions of Ontology: Writing and the Speech-Language Divide 1. How we are Introduced to the Study of Spoken Language 2. The Modality-Independence Argument and Storylines of the Origin of Symbolic Language 3. The Recent History of Attempts to Ground Orthographic Concepts of Language Theory Part II. Questions of Epistemology: The Role of Instrumental Observations 4. Recognizing the Bias 5. (Re-) Defining the Writing Bias, and the Essential Role of Instrumental Invalidation Part III. The Structure of Speech Acts: 6. Utterances as Communicative Acts 7. Relating to Basic Units: Syllable-Like Cycles 8. Relating Neural Oscillations to Syllable Cycles and Chunks 9. Breath-Units of Speech and their Structural Effects Part IV. The Processing of Speech Meaning: 10. The Neural Coding of Semantics 11. Processes of Utterance Interpretation: For a Neuropragmatics Index.
520			_a"For many readers of the present work, the notion that language is separate from speech (or that language competence is separate from performance) will likely have been acquired in an introductory course to language study. This notion can have a major influence on how language is conceptualized, and presents a central tenet in the field. In examining introductory texts used by generations of students (e.g. the multiple editions of Akmajian, Demers, Farmer et al., 2010; Fromkin, Rodman, & Hyams, 2013, and others), one finds typical arguments for distinguishing speech from language. These arguments serve to specify not only the object of study, but also how to study it. However, all these arguments, it should be pointed out once more, involve written material"-- _cProvided by publisher.
650		0	_aLinguistics.
650		0	_aWritten communication.
650		0	_aSpeech.
650		0	_aPhonetics.
650		0	_aPsycholinguistics.
776	0	8	_iOnline version: _aBoucher, Victor J., 1959- _tStudy of speech processes _dCambridge, United Kingdom ; New York, NY : Cambridge University Press, 2020. _z9781316882764 _w(DLC) 2020031617
906			_a7 _bcbc _corignew _d1 _eecip _f20 _gy-gencatlg
942			_2ddc _cRFT