000			03480cam a22003738i 4500
999			_c19299 _d19299
001			22056870
003			OSt
005			20230131150110.0
008			210527r20222017enk 001 0 eng
010			_a 2021025497
020			_a9781108995214 _q(paperback)
040			_aDLC _beng _erda _cDLC
042			_apcc
082	0	0	_a616.890 072 KAZ _223
084			_aPSY007000 _2bisacsh
100	1		_aKazdin, Alan E., _eauthor.
245	1	0	_aResearch design in clinical psychology / _cAlan E Kazdin, Yale University, Connecticut.
250			_aFifth edition.
263			_a2112
264		1	_aCambridge, United Kingdom ; _aNew York, NY : _bCambridge University Press, _c[2022]
300			_a558 pages
336			_atext _btxt _2rdacontent
337			_aunmediated _bn _2rdamedia
338			_avolume _bnc _2rdacarrier
500			_aOriginally published, 2017.
500			_aIncludes index.
505			_aPreface; About the Author; 1. Introduction; 2. Internal and External Validity; 3. Construct and Data-Evaluation Validity; 4. Ideas that Begin the Research Process; 5. Experimental Research Using Group Designs; 6. Control and Comparison Groups; 7. Case-Control and Cohort Designs; 8. Single-Case Experimental Research Designs; 9. Qualitative Research Methods; 10. Selecting Measures for Research; 11. Assessment: Types of Measures and Their Use; 12. Special Topics of Assessment; 13. Null Hypothesis Significance Testing; 14. Presenting and Analyzing the Data; 15. Cautions, Negative Effects, and Replication; 16. Ethical Issues and Guidelines for Research; 17. Scientific Integrity; 18. Communication of Research Findings; 19. Methodology: Constantly Evolving along with Advances in Science; Glossary; References; End Notes; Name Index; Subject Index.
520			_a"There are many sciences, and it would be valuable, if not essential, to have the principles and practices consistent. We would not want the criteria for what "counts" as knowledge to vary as a function of quite different ways of going about obtaining that knowledge. This consistency is more important than ever because much of research on a given topic involves the collaboration of scientists from many different fields to address a question. They must speak the same language, share the same underlying values about how to obtain knowledge, and agree on procedures and practices (e.g., statistical evaluation, reporting data that do and do not support a particular hypothesis). Consistency also is critical within any given scientific discipline. For a given science (e.g., psychology), we would want consistency throughout the world in what the standards are for obtaining scientific knowledge- the accumulation of knowledge from all individuals in a given field requires this level of consistency. Science "says" essentially, these are our goals (e.g., describe, understand, explain, intervene where needed, possible, and desirable) and these are our means (use of theory, methodology, guiding concepts, replication of results). Science is hardly a "game" because so many of the tasks we have are serious. Yet there are rules, and there are enormous benefits from following them among all sciences and scientists"-- _cProvided by publisher.
650		0	_aClinical psychology _xResearch _xMethodology.
650		7	_aPSYCHOLOGY / Clinical Psychology _2bisacsh
906			_a7 _bcbc _corignew _d1 _eecip _f20 _gy-gencatlg
942			_2ddc _cRFT