| 000 | 02053caa a2200229 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | 210629s9999 xx 000 0 und d | ||
| 022 | _a2249-9520 | ||
| 100 | _aSandeep Maruthy, | ||
| 245 | 0 | _aTest-retest reliability of contralateral suppression of acoustic middle ear muscle reflex | |
| 260 | _c2017 | ||
| 270 | _aDepartment of Audiology, All India Institute of Speech and Hearing, Mysore - 570 006, Karnataka | ||
| 300 | _a89-93 | ||
| 490 | _vVolume 23 Issue 2 | ||
| 520 | _aBackground and Objective: The role of efferent system in auditory perception is very important. To assess this, a reliable measure of efferent functioning is necessary. The efferent suppression of otoacoustic emission lacks good test-retest reliability, and there is a need to look for the reliability of other measures of efferent auditory functioning. The current study evaluated the test-retest reliability of contralateral suppression of acoustically evoked middle ear muscle reflexes (MEMR). Method: Nineteen normal hearing adults in the age range of 18–24 years participated in the study. A Repeated measures design was used to establish the reliability of the contralateral suppression of MEMR. Measurements were spaced 1 h and 1 day apart. Results: The results showed acceptable test-retest reliability of contralateral suppression of acoustically evoked MEMR in terms of its Cronbach's alpha. However, inspection of the individual data did not support the impression to call it a reliable tool to assess efferent auditory functioning. The findings of the study are discussed in light of its clinical utility. Conclusion: Contralateral suppression of acoustically evoked MEMR has questionable reliability to be used as a clinical tool. | ||
| 653 | _aEfferent suppression, middle ear muscle reflexes, test-retest reliability | ||
| 700 | _aNayana, M | ||
| 700 | _aNike Gnanateja, G | ||
| 700 | _aShamantha, M | ||
| 773 | _aIndian Journal of Otology | ||
| 856 | _uhttps://www.indianjotol.org/text.asp?2017/23/2/89/208017 | ||
| 942 |
_cFJAS _yFJAS |
||
| 999 |
_c17812 _d17812 |
||