| 000 | 01900caa a2200229 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | 210621s9999 xx 000 0 und d | ||
| 022 | _a2582-4961 | ||
| 100 | _aMadhu Sudharshan Reddy, B | ||
| 245 | 0 | _aSmoothened cepstral peak prominence in choral singers, trained singers and non-singers | |
| 260 |
_bAll India Institute of Speech and Hearing _c2014 |
||
| 270 | _aAll India Institute of Speech and Hearing | ||
| 270 | _mmadhusudarshan@rocketmail.com | ||
| 300 | _a18-23 | ||
| 490 | _vVolume 33 | ||
| 520 | _aThe aim of the study was to understand the vocal quality of voice and eect of speech tasks on Smoothened Cepstral peak prominence (Smoothened CPP) across singers. Three groups of participants com- prising of 16 choral singers, 13 trained singers and 16 non singers were considered. Speech-Tool program developed by Hillenbrand (1994) was used to analyze the Smoothened CPP. Mixed ANOVA was carried out to verify the statistical signicance of dierence across the groups and speech tasks. Both Choral singers and trained singers obtained higher smoothened cepstral peak prominence than non-singers. Within singers, trained singers obtained higher smoothened CPP values than Choral singers; however the dierence was not statistically signicant. With respect to speech tasks, smoothened CPP was found to be higher for sustained phonation than Reading and this dierence was found to be statistically signicant. Hence, Smoothened CPP was able to dierentiate singers and non-singers irrespective of the speech tasks used. | ||
| 653 | _aSpeech tool programme, Smoothened Cepstral peak, prominence (Smoothened CPP),Choral singers, Trained singers | ||
| 700 | _aGopi Kishore Pebbili | ||
| 700 | _aVijaitha V Soonana | ||
| 773 | _aJournal of All India Institute of Speech & Hearing | ||
| 856 | _uhttp://192.168.102.7/jaiish/index.php/aiish/article/view/773/466 | ||
| 942 |
_cFJAS _yFJAS |
||
| 999 |
_c17677 _d17677 |
||