000 02384caa a2200229 4500
008 210621s9999 xx 000 0 und d
022 _a2249-9571
100 _aPrashanth Prabhu,
245 0 _aStimulus and Subject Factors Affecting Contralateral Suppression of Acoustic Reflexes
260 _c2016
270 _aAll India Institute of Speech and Hearing, Mysore, India
300 _a473-479
490 _vVolume 6 Issue 1
520 _aContralateral Suppression of Acoustic Reflex is used as a diagnostic tool to measure the functioning of the medial efferent auditory system. The study assessed the effect of different reflex eliciting signals and the ear and gender effect on contralateral suppression of acoustic reflexes. A clinical observational design was used to achieve the objective. 30 normal hearing subjects between age group of 17-30 years were randomly selected. A comparison between baseline acoustic reflex threshold and amplitude (at 10 dB SL) with the presence and absence of 40 dB SL white noise in the contralateral ear was recorded. The results of the study showed that there was suppression of acoustic reflex threshold and reflex amplitude for 500Hz, 1000 Hz, and 2000 Hz, low band noise, high band noise, broad band noise and clicks. However, there was no significant difference in the amount of suppression of acoustic reflex threshold and reflex amplitude across stimuli, gender and across left and right ears. The result of the study shows that there is no effect of different stimuli on contralateral suppression of acoustic reflexes. In addition, there was no ear effect and gender effect on contralateral suppression of acoustic reflexes. Further studies with all the stimuli on hearing impaired population are essential to know whether the method can be used for a larger clinical population.
653 _aContralateral Suppression of Acoustic Reflex Threshold, Contralateral Suppression of Acoustic Reflex Amplitude, Stimulus effect, Ear Effect, Gender Effect, Medial efferent system.
700 _aAkriti Kumar
700 _aRevathi, R
700 _aShezeen Abdul Gafoor
773 _aInternational Journal of Health Sciences and Research
856 _uhttps://www.ijhsr.org/IJHSR_Vol.6_Issue.1_Jan2016/65.pdf
942 _cFJAS
_yFJAS
999 _c17662
_d17662