000			03774caa a2200361 4500
008			210621s9999 xx 000 0 und d
022			_a1178-1998
100			_aManchaiah, V
245		0	_aSocial representation of “hearing loss”: cross-cultural exploratory study in India, Iran, Portugal, and the UK
260			_c2015
270			_aAll India Institute of Speech and Hearing, University of Mysore, Mysore, India
270			_aCentre for Speech Language Therapy and Hearing, Cardiff Metropolitan University, Cardiff, UK
270			_aDepartment of Audiology, School of Allied Health Sciences, Polytechnic Institute of Porto, Vila Nova de Gaia, Portugal
270			_aDepartment of Audiology, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran
270			_aDepartment of Health and Welfare Studies, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden
270			_aDepartment of Social Science and Law, Tianjin University of Technology, Tianjin, People’s Republic of China
270			_aDepartment of Speech and Hearing Sciences, Lamar University, Beaumont, TX, USA
270			_aSwedish Institute for Disability Research, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
300			_a1857—1872
490			_vVolume 2015 Issue 10
520			_aBackground: Hearing loss is one of the most common chronic conditions in older adults. In audiology literature, several studies have examined the attitudes and behavior of people with hearing loss; however, not much is known about the manner in which society in general views and perceives hearing loss. This exploratory study was aimed at understanding the social representation of hearing loss (among the general public) in the countries of India, Iran, Portugal, and the UK. We also compared these social representations.Materials and methods: The study involved a cross-sectional design, and participants were recruited using the snowball sampling method. A total of 404 people from four countries participated in the study. Data were collected using a free-association task where participants were asked to produce up to five words or phrases that came to mind while thinking about hearing loss. In addition, they were also asked to indicate if each word they presented had positive, neutral, or negative associations in their view. Data were analyzed using various qualitative and quantitative methods.Results: The most frequently occurring categories were: assessment and management; causes of hearing loss; communication difficulties; disability; hearing ability or disability; hearing instruments; negative mental state; the attitudes of others; and sound and acoustics of the environment. Some categories were reported with similar frequency in most countries (eg, causes of hearing loss, communication difficulties, and negative mental state), whereas others differed among countries. Participants in India reported significantly more positive and fewer negative associations when compared to participants from Iran, Portugal, and the UK. However, there was no statistical difference among neutral responses reported among these countries. Also, more differences were noted among these countries than similarities.Conclusion: These findings provide useful insights into the public perception of hearing loss that may prove useful in public education and counseling.
653			_ahearing loss, hearing impairment, social representation, societal attitude, cross-culture, perception of disability
700			_aAhmadi, T
700			_aDanermark, B
700			_aGermundsson, P
700			_aKrishna, R
700			_aLi, Q
700			_aTomé, D
700			_aZhao, F
773			_aClinical Interventions in Aging
856			_uhttps://doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S91076
942			_cFJAS _yFJAS
999			_c17629 _d17629