<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>02629caa a2200193   4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="008">210629s9999    xx            000 0 und d</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="022" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">1930-2940</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Amoolya, G</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2="0">
    <subfield code="a">Grammaticalityin Written Language of Bilingual-Biliterate Children with Learning Disability</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">2018</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">1-14</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="490" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="v">Volume 18 Issue 8</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">It  has  been  well  established  that  children  with  Learning  Disability  (LD)have  deficits  in their grammatical knowledge. Additionally, research involving the assessment of written language difficulties in both the languages of biliterate students is not routinely conducted. Need for such research  in  a  country  like  India  is  indispensablesince  majority  of  the  citizens  in  India  are bi/multilinguals.Thus, the purpose of the present study was to investigate whether language (Kannada vs. English)  and  genre  of  writing  (Expository  vs.  narrative)  has  an  influence  on  the  grammatical abilities in the written language of children with LD. The participants were 15 Kannada-English bilingual-biliterate  childrenwith LDand14 Typically Developing Children(TDC)within  the same age group (9 to 10 years of age) and similar linguistic background. Children were asked to produce written compositions in response to verbal prompts to one expository and one narrative taskin both Kannada and English. Total number of grammatical T-units(Gram T-unit)in the sample wascalculated using the SALT software.  On comparison of the percentage of Gram T-units, it was found that TDC performed better than  children  with  LD  on  most  of  the  tasks. In  Kannada,  there  was  no  significant  difference between the performances of children between the two tasks. In English, there was a significant difference in the performance of children when the narrative and expository tasks were compared. The reasons for the effect of task on L2 and the absence of a similar effect in L1 havebeen looked into. The  results  have  been  discussed  in  terms  ofhow  theamount  of  exposure  to  a  particular language determines the grammatical abilities in a particular language. Furthermore, how language and nature of the tasks (Expository vs. narrative) influencewritten language of children have also been discussed.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">biliteracy, written language, expository task, narrative task, grammatical T-units, grammaticality, written language, learning disability</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Jayashree. C. Shanbal</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Language in India</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">http://www.languageinindia.com/aug2018/amoolyalearningdisability.pdf</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">FJAS</subfield>
    <subfield code="y">FJAS</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">18067</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">18067</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
