<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>02483caa a2200193   4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="008">210629s9999    xx            000 0 und d</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="022" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">2169-5725</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Roshni Pillai </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2="0">
    <subfield code="a">Two scoring procedures to evaluate memory and sequencing in auditory, visual and auditory-visual combined modalities</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="b">Informa UK Limited</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">2017</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">214-220 </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="490" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="v">Volume 15  Issue 4</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Aim: The present study was carried out to evaluate whether there exists a relation between two scoring procedures (score and span) to evaluate memory as well as sequencing within three modality conditions (auditory, visual and auditory-visual).Methods: The auditory memory and sequencing abilities of 30 typically developing children aged &#x2265;7 to &lt;9 years were determined using &#x2018;Revised Auditory Memory and Sequencing Test in Indian-English&#x2019; (RAMST-IE) developed by Yathirajet al. Visual as well as auditory-visual memory and sequencing were assessed using visual and auditory-visual tests that were analogous to the auditory test. &#x2018;Scores&#x2019; and &#x2018;span&#x2019; were estimated for all three modality conditions, with the former scoring procedure being longer than the latter.Results: It was observed in all three modality conditions that the children performed better on the memory skill when compared to the sequencing skill. Further, after elimination of two outliers, Pearson&#x2019;s correlation was carried out to check the relation between the two scoring procedures. It was observed that there was a significant moderate correlation between the two scoring measures (score and span) for the visual and auditory-visual modality conditions. This was seen for both memory and sequencing skills. However, for the auditory modality, a significant moderate correlation was observed for the sequencing skill and not for the memory skill.Conclusion: The results of the study indicate that the calculation of &#x2018;span&#x2019; could be used instead of calculation of &#x2018;scores&#x2019;, when time is a constrain. This can be done only for the visual and for the auditory-visual modality conditions. However, it is recommended that if subtle memory problems are to be detected, the calculation of &#x2018;scores&#x2019; would yield better results.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Memory scores, memory span, sequencing scores, sequencing span</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Asha Yathiraj</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Hearing, Balance and Communication</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1080/21695717.2017.1380966</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">FJAS</subfield>
    <subfield code="y">FJAS</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">17796</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">17796</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
