<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<mods xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.1" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-1.xsd">
  <titleInfo>
    <title>Language Familiarity Hypothesis and Delayed Auditory Feedback: A Study on Speech Disruptions in Typical Kannada (L1)-English (L2) Bilinguals</title>
  </titleInfo>
  <name type="personal">
    <namePart>Bannuru Venkatanarayana Manjunatha Mahesh</namePart>
    <role>
      <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">creator</roleTerm>
    </role>
  </name>
  <name type="personal">
    <namePart>Kempanapura Siddaraju Apoorva Prathibha</namePart>
  </name>
  <name type="personal">
    <namePart>Nanjundaswamy Kajo</namePart>
  </name>
  <name type="personal">
    <namePart>Srikantaswamy Vijayeshwari</namePart>
  </name>
  <typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
  <originInfo>
    <place>
      <placeTerm type="code" authority="marccountry">xx</placeTerm>
    </place>
    <dateIssued>2019</dateIssued>
    <dateIssued encoding="marc">9999</dateIssued>
    <issuance>monographic</issuance>
  </originInfo>
  <language>
    <languageTerm authority="iso639-2b" type="code">und</languageTerm>
  </language>
  <physicalDescription>
    <form authority="marcform">print</form>
    <extent>154-171</extent>
  </physicalDescription>
  <abstract>Objectives: The study examined the language familiarity hypothesis on speech disruptions in  Kannada  (L1)-English  (L2)  bilinguals  using  delayed  auditory  feedback  (DAF).  Methods:Fourteen participants were classified into high and low L2 proficient bilingual groups (n = 7 each).  Experimental  tasks  involved  reading  the  standard  passages  and  answering  ques-tions in both L1 and L2 on 150 ms and 250 ms DAF. Speech disruptions were grouped into articulatory, repetition, and other errors for the experimental tasks. A shorter delay of 150 ms, but not the longer delay (250 ms) showed task specific speech errors. Results: Reading passages showed repetition and articulatory errors in L1 and L2, respectively, but other er-rors were more common while answering questions. Interestingly, low L2 proficient speak-ers  showed  higher  articulatory  errors  in  L1  across  the  experimental  tasks.  Between  lan-guage  comparisons  revealed  greater  speech  disruptions  in  L1,  which  was  specific  to  the  experimental task. Articulatory errors during reading and repetition errors while answering the  questions  were  observed  in  the  native  language  (L1).  While  refuting  the  language  fa-miliarity  hypothesis  in  bilinguals,  current  findings  favour  task  specific  variation  in  speech  disruptions in typical bilinguals. Conclusion: Current findings propose alternative explana-tions  including  the  influence  of  attention  control  on  speech  disruptions  under  auditory  delay.  Findings  also  offer  implications  for  the  current  research  on  bilingual  speakers  with  stuttering. </abstract>
  <subject>
    <topic>Language familiarity, Kannada, Delayed auditory feedback, English proficiency, Speech disruptions</topic>
  </subject>
  <relatedItem type="host">
    <name>
      <namePart>Communication Sciences and Disorders</namePart>
    </name>
  </relatedItem>
  <identifier type="uri">https://doi.org/10.12963/csd.18572</identifier>
  <location>
    <url>https://doi.org/10.12963/csd.18572</url>
  </location>
  <recordInfo>
    <recordCreationDate encoding="marc">210629</recordCreationDate>
  </recordInfo>
</mods>
