<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>02541caa a2200217   4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="008">210629s9999    xx            000 0 und d</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Bannuru Venkatanarayana Manjunatha Mahesh</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2="0">
    <subfield code="a">Language Familiarity Hypothesis and Delayed Auditory Feedback: A Study on Speech Disruptions in Typical Kannada (L1)-English (L2) Bilinguals</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">2019</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="270" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">All India Institute of Speech and Hearing - Naimisham Campus, Manasagangothri, Mysore, India</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">154-171</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="490" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="v">Volume 24  Issue 1</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Objectives: The study examined the language familiarity hypothesis on speech disruptions in  Kannada  (L1)-English  (L2)  bilinguals  using  delayed  auditory  feedback  (DAF).  Methods:Fourteen participants were classified into high and low L2 proficient bilingual groups (n = 7 each).  Experimental  tasks  involved  reading  the  standard  passages  and  answering  ques-tions in both L1 and L2 on 150 ms and 250 ms DAF. Speech disruptions were grouped into articulatory, repetition, and other errors for the experimental tasks. A shorter delay of 150 ms, but not the longer delay (250 ms) showed task specific speech errors. Results: Reading passages showed repetition and articulatory errors in L1 and L2, respectively, but other er-rors were more common while answering questions. Interestingly, low L2 proficient speak-ers  showed  higher  articulatory  errors  in  L1  across  the  experimental  tasks.  Between  lan-guage  comparisons  revealed  greater  speech  disruptions  in  L1,  which  was  specific  to  the  experimental task. Articulatory errors during reading and repetition errors while answering the  questions  were  observed  in  the  native  language  (L1).  While  refuting  the  language  fa-miliarity  hypothesis  in  bilinguals,  current  findings  favour  task  specific  variation  in  speech  disruptions in typical bilinguals. Conclusion: Current findings propose alternative explana-tions  including  the  influence  of  attention  control  on  speech  disruptions  under  auditory  delay.  Findings  also  offer  implications  for  the  current  research  on  bilingual  speakers  with  stuttering. </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Language familiarity, Kannada, Delayed auditory feedback, English proficiency, Speech disruptions</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Kempanapura Siddaraju Apoorva Prathibha</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Nanjundaswamy Kajo</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Srikantaswamy Vijayeshwari</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Communication Sciences and Disorders</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.12963/csd.18572</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">FJAS</subfield>
    <subfield code="y">FJAS</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">17750</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">17750</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
