Short-Term Reliability of Different Methods of Contralateral Suppression of Transient Evoked Otoacoustic Emission in Children and Adults (Record no. 17728)
[ view plain ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 02414caa a2200193 4500 |
| 022 ## - INTERNATIONAL STANDARD SERIAL NUMBER | |
| International Standard Serial Number | 1558-9137 |
| 100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Shreyank P. Swamy |
| 245 #0 - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | Short-Term Reliability of Different Methods of Contralateral Suppression of Transient Evoked Otoacoustic Emission in Children and Adults |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
| Name of publisher, distributor, etc. | ASHA |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 2019 |
| 270 ## - ADDRESS | |
| Address | All India Institute of Speech and Hearing, Manasagangothri, Mysuru, India |
| 300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION | |
| Extent | 495-507 |
| 490 ## - SERIES STATEMENT | |
| Volume/sequential designation | Volume 28 Issue 2s |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | Purpose :This study aimed to investigate the reliability of 3 methods to measure contralateral suppression of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAEs) in children and adults.Method:Contralateral suppression of TEOAEs was measured in 14 adults and 14 children using 3 methods with and without contralateral acoustic stimulus (CAS). Method-I having “2 s on-off” and Method-II having “10 s on-off” interleaved presentation of white noise. Method-III used “continuous presentation of white noise”. Test–retest reliability was checked in adults without removing the probe (same-probe recording) and reinserting the probe (different-probe recording) and in children using a different-probe recording.Results:The absolute suppression amplitude of TEOAEs was higher for “continuous noise,” followed by “10 s on-off” and “2 s on-off” CAS. There was no significant effect of age across the 2 probe recordings, 3 methods of TEOAEs with and without CAS, and for the absolute suppression amplitude. Also, in adults, there was no significant difference between same-probe and different-probe recordings across the 3 methods. High internal consistency was observed on Cronbach's alpha (α > .9) for the 3 methods and 2 probe recordings. High agreement and correlation between the recordings for all 3 methods were seen using Bland–Altman plots and Pearson product–moment correlation coefficient.Conclusion:The study demonstrated that highly reliable contralateral suppression of TEOAE can be measured using the 3 methods in adults and children. However, continuous presentation of CAS resulted in greater TEOAE suppression amplitude compared to interleaved presentation of CAS; hence, the former is recommended. |
| 700 ## - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Asha Yathiraj |
| 773 ## - HOST ITEM ENTRY | |
| Main entry heading | American Journal of Audiology |
| 856 ## - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS | |
| Uniform Resource Identifier | https://doi.org/10.1044/2018_AJA-IND50-18-0093 |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) | |
| Koha item type | Faculty Publications |
| -- | FJAS |
No items available.